Reviewers

Artechno : Journal of Arts, Technology and Creativity

Open Access · Free to read

Artechno: Journal of Arts, Technology and Creativity is a peer-reviewed open-access journal that publishes scholarly works examining the relationships among arts, technology, creativity, culture, and contemporary creative practices. The journal provides an interdisciplinary platform for researchers, artists, designers, educators, technologists, cultural practitioners, and creative industry professionals to discuss the development, application, experience, and implications of technology within artistic and cultural contexts.

Artechno welcomes original research articles, review articles, practice-based studies, design and development studies, and critical interdisciplinary inquiries. The journal particularly encourages manuscripts that establish a substantive relationship among artistic practices, technological development, and creative processes.

First Published

2026

Issues/Year

Twice a year, in June and December

Language

English

Artechno acknowledges the scholarly contribution of reviewers who support the quality, credibility, and development of published research. Reviewers are selected for relevant expertise, methodological competence, independence, and capacity to provide constructive and timely assessment.

The journal may publish an annual list of reviewers who completed reviews during the stated period, provided that publication does not reveal the reviewer assigned to a specific manuscript. Reviewer recognition remains separate from editorial decisions and does not imply endorsement of every article published by the journal.

[INSERT VERIFIED REVIEWER NAMES, AFFILIATIONS, COUNTRIES, AND ORCID URLS AFTER THEY HAVE COMPLETED REVIEWS OR AGREED TO BE LISTED]

Reviewer Responsibilities

Accept assignments only when the manuscript falls within the reviewer’s competence and the review can be completed within the requested period.
Disclose conflicts of interest promptly and decline the assignment when impartial review is not possible.
Protect manuscript confidentiality and do not share, upload, reproduce, or use unpublished content without authorization.
Evaluate the work objectively and respectfully, addressing the manuscript rather than the author.
Identify unsupported claims, methodological concerns, missing literature, ethical issues, and potential overlap with other publications.
Avoid requesting citations primarily intended to increase personal, journal, or institutional citation counts.
Do not use public generative AI systems to process confidential manuscripts or review reports.